Is Online Poker Rigged or Fair? Why Independent Testing Is Important
You'll find countless articles, blog posts and forum threads which have attemptedto answer to the question and them all have failed to perform so.

The utmost effective of the provide compelling arguments regarding the reasons Online Poker should be fair or rigged, although none can claim to be definitive or conclusive. The explanation for this can be that these arguments, it doesn't matter how sound, are derived from reason alone - they're not supported by any evidence.
In a nutshell it is a philosophical way of the question, i.e. the argument is dependant on pure thought. Although a philosophical approach has value it may be frustrating when placed on an issue such as this because every argument leaves room for a desk argument. The end result is that the debate continues on and on and round in circles without reaching any conclusion. A scientific approach where evidence is used to try a disagreement is a better approach.

It is true that poker sites have always had their Random Number Generators (RNGs) tested but the truth is that always these tests are carried out by the poker sites themselves so can't be viewed objective. Also, these tests have previously been restricted to the RNGs and don't test the algorithms that effectively'deal'the cards.
However, for the very first time since Dominoqq online poker began independent tests are increasingly being run using a wide scale to try to answer the question: "Is Online Poker Rigged?" The tests follow sound scientific practice and have previously been performed on most of the popular poker sites and networks. PokerStars, Party Poker, the Ongame Network, the Merge Network and the Entraction Network have all been tested - over ¾ on most players online use these sites so the end result have relevance for online poker in general.

In a nutshell, the tests analyse histories from real hands which were data-mined from the poker sites and use these to check if'good'players receive more'misfortune'than they ought to if random cards were used. Much increased detail are available in the total report of every test. Up to now the end result for every single site demonstrate "no proof rigging" that could only be a very important thing for the net poker industry.

After the first few tests some sceptical observers commented that it is going to be feasible for the tests themselves to be rigged, or that the first dataset may be tampered with to exhibit fair results. In the long run, the net poker industry is a multi-billion dollar industry and when large sums of money are involved, several things are possible. As a reply to the Online Poker Watchdog produced a downloadable'app'that players can use to analyse their very own hand histories. Applying this, players can be sure that the data is real because it's data from their very own games - they could test their very own hand histories to check that the games they've been playing are fair.

Before we jump to any grand conclusions though, the tests aren't without limitations as they just check first of all kind of bias. You'll find other possible methods of rigging that will not be found by these tests. However, once this series of tests are complete new tests is apt to be performed to detect other biases.
Or visit this link or this one